| |
Issue no. 35 - December 1988
pdf
version of this
Issue
There is much information in this issue that is valuable
and useful. Online readers are reminded, however, that treatment guidelines and health
care practices change over time. If you are in doubt, please refer to
WHO's up-to-date Dehydration Treatment
Plans.
|
Pages 1-8 Dialogue on Diarrhoea Online Issue 35 -
December 1988
DDOnline Dialogue
on Diarrhoea Online Issue 35 December 1988
Page 1 2
Mothers need to know about oral rehydration therapy, and primary
health care workers can provide appropriate information.
The well known journal, The Lancet, suggested in 1978 that oral rehydration
therapy was potentially the most important medical advance of the century. Our last
issue looked at what has been achieved in treatment and control of diarrhoea over the past
decade by WHO, UNICEF and USAID. Our next issue will feature highlights from the Third
International Conference on Oral Rehydration Therapy (ICORT III), held in December 1988. State of the World's Children
Meanwhile, UNICEF's newly published report on The State of the World's Children
criticises many current approaches to development as being of least benefit to those most
in need. Immunisation and oral rehydration programmes help greatly to reduce illness and
death among children. But adequate nutrition, clean water, safe sanitation, improved
housing, primary health care and basic education remain key factors in child survival; and
child spacing and family size limitation are increasingly recognized as essential to
maternal as well as child health. Recent DDs have covered many of these themes and especially emphasized the value
to families of female education. As the concept of home-based ORT gains acceptance, spread
of knowledge and understanding becomes a key issue at every level. Looking forward Development of even more effective ORT solutions and diarrhoeal disease control
measures must go hand-in-hand with wider understanding of why diarrhoea causes dehydration
and how ORT works (see="#page4">pages 4 and 5), more
accurate home measurement alternatives (see="#page6">page 6) and better
appreciation of how cultural, behavioural, economic and environmental factors influence
the spread and outcome of diarrhoeal infections. KME and WAMC
|
In this issue:
- Diarrhoea pathophysiology
- Zimbabwe: measuring home-made ORS
- AIDS and diarrhoea
|
DDOnline Dialogue
on Diarrhoea Online Issue 35 December 1988 1 Page 2 3
Health Care Together Health Care Together -Training Exercises for Health Workers in Community Based
Programmes, edited by Mary Johnston and Susan Rifkin, contains teaching exercises for all
levels of health personnel who are likely to be involved in community based primary health
care.
|
Talking together is an effective way to develop good
communication skills. The manual is aimed at trainers and the exercises are designed to encourage health
workers to develop appropriate skills and attitudes - particularly in the area of
communications - so that they can respond to the needs of communities.
|
Published by Macmillan, the manual is available from Teaching Aids at Low Cost, P O Box
49, St Albans, Herts AL1 4AX, U. K. and costs £1.95 (plus postage and packing). Small Scale Sanitation The Ross Bulletin No 8 on Small Scale Sanitation, has recently been updated and revised
by Dr Sandy Cairncross. Its sixty pages cover, in easy to read language, the advances of
the last ten years in knowledge about low cost sanitation. The booklet contains many
excellent illustrations, a useful glossary, references and lists of addresses, and will be
useful for environmental health workers at all levels. Available from the Ross Institute
Information and Advisory Service, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel
Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK, the bulletin costs £3.00 (inclusive of postage and packing). Wall Chart Helminths Eggs and Larvae Found in Faeces is a plastic-coated A2 wall chart (colour),
available to readers in developing countries at a special price of £1.00 (plus £0.50
airmail postage) from Tropical Health Technology, an organisation which provides a non
profit equipment service to district hospitals and primary health care laboratories in
developing countries. For further information please write to Tropical Health Technology,
14 Bevills Close, Doddington, March, Cambridgeshire, PE15 0TT, UK. Rehabilitation newsletter from AHRTAG Community Based Rehabilitation, (CBR) News is a new international newsletter
providing practical information about rehabilitation of disabled people. CBR News is
especially concerned with bringing rehabilitation services to the disabled in their own
families and communities, involving disabled people themselves in planning and providing
these services, and includes practical advice and information about low cost aids and
equipment. CBR News is published three times a year, by AHRTAG and the Institute of Child
Health in London. Like AHRTAG's other newsletters - DD, ARI News and AIDS Action
- CBR News is available free of charge to readers in developing countries
(there is a subscription fee of £10.00 or US$ 20.00 per year to other readers). Please
write to AHRTAG for further information.
News about DD
Readers may be interested to know that Dialogue on Diarrhoea is now available in
Chinese, Bangla and Tamil editions as well as French, Spanish, Portuguese and Arabic. If
you would like to receive DD in any of these languages please write to AHRTAG, 1
London Bridge Street, London SE1 9SG, UK.
Children's Poster Competition. An exhibition of some of the best posters entered for
the DD Children's Poster Competition was held at the Commonwealth Institute in
London in October 1988. The exhibition created a great deal of interest and many
organisations have asked if they can use the posters to promote better health awareness.
The posters were also displayed at the Third International Conference on ORT in December
1988 in Washington D. C., USA. Prizes have been sent out to all winners and runners up,
and in addition, all children who submitted a poster will receive a small prize as well as
a certificate.
The DD editors would like to say a belated but special thank you to the
Voluntary Health Association of India for their help, VHAI not only widely publicised the
poster competition in India, but also arranged for the many entries this publicity
generated to be brought over to the UK. VHAI have also kindly offered to help with
distribution of prizes within India. Many thanks also to the Hog Harbour primary school in
Vanuatu, as well as to all other readers who collected posters for the competition.
Finally, the editors would like to thank Air India for their generous assistance in
transporting prizes to India.
|
|
DDOnline Dialogue
on Diarrhoea Online Issue 35 December 1988 2 Page 3 4
Enteric disease is a frequent clinical finding in acquired
immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). Micro-organisms known to cause diarrhoea are found in
the stools of many AIDS patients with diarrhoea; however, in a significant proportion of
cases, no agents are found. Leonardo Mata reports. Diarrhoea is considered to be an 'indicator disease' of AIDS, if it is caused by Cryosporidium,
Isospora and cytomegalovirus, or in some instances by Salmonella or Shigella.
People with AIDS have an impaired immune function and succumb to gut colonisation or
invasion by common enteroviruses, Cryptosporidium or Isospora. Persistence
of enteric agents is associated with both acute and chronic diarrhoea and with wasting.
Bacterial overgrowth may also develop in the small intestine of AIDS-infected persons,
causing chronic diarrhoea and malabsorption. This resembles the non-HIV tropical jejunitis
seen in less developed countries. Last but not least, the human immunodeficiency virus
(HIV) - itself the accepted cause of AIDS - is found in the intestinal crypts and lamina
propria of persons with AIDS. It is likely that other organisms will be added to the list
of agents associated with AIDS diarrhoea, for example Trichinella spiralis, Capillaria
philippinensis, papovavirus. Similarities have been noted between the faecal flora of AIDS-infected persons and
those of immunocompetent (normally immune) children living in deprived rural
circumstances. Pathogenic and opportunistic agents are similar in both groups; both show
multiple infections; in both, acute and chronic diarrhoea are frequent, often leading to
malabsorption and wasting (in children, failure to thrive). Supportive therapy There is no effective cure for the diarrhoeal diseases of AIDS. Abatement of the
illness after antimicrobial therapy may be followed by relapse, or proliferation of other
diarrhoeal organisms. Supportive therapy consists of giving oral and intravenous
rehydration solutions to correct fluid and electrolyte imbalance, and food. Management of
AIDS diarrhoea is complicated by the difficulties in eliminating the agent and associated
symptoms, and by the critical condition of the patients. Since gut pathogens are significantly more prevalent in less developed countries, they
are likely to play a greater role in AIDS there. HIV infection rates are similar in both
sexes in central Africa, as are rates of AIDS diarrhoea. Transmission of enteric agents in
the general population is by the faecal-oral route, person-to-person, and via contaminated
food/water and flies; and rates of diarrhoeal disease are also similar in both sexes. Currently in North America and Western Europe, HIV infection and hence, AIDS diarrhoea,
occurs primarily in homosexual men. Efforts to improve personal hygiene and environmental
sanitation should continue to receive a high priority in less developed countries where
transmission of diarrhoea agents is favoured by poor hygiene and environmental sanitation.
Enteric agents associated with diarrhoea in
AIDS* |
Group |
Agent |
Clinical spectrum |
helminths |
Strongyloides stercoralis |
diarrhoea, cramps, wasting |
protozoa |
Isospora belli
Cryptosporidium spp. microsporidia
Giardia lamblia
Entamoeba histolytica
Dientamoeba fragilis |
diarrhoea, cramps, malabsorption, wasting |
bacteria |
Chlamydia trachomatis
Campylobacter jejuni
Other Campylobacter
Shigella spp.
Clostridium difficile
Vibrio parahemolyticus
Mycobacterium avium Intracellulare
bacterial overgrowth of small intestine |
diarrhoea, cramps, septicemia, colitis, wasting |
viruses |
cytomegalovirus
herpes simplex
human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) |
diarrhoea, colitis, wasting |
* Adenoviruses and other enteric viruses are common in persons with AIDS |
Professor L Mata, Professor and Head of Microbiology, Institute for
Health Research (INISA), University of Costa Rica, Costa Rica.
Archer, D L. and Glinsmann, W H. 1988. Enteric infections and other cofactors in
AIDS. Immunology Today, 6.292-5. Budhraja. ,M. Levendoglu. H et al., 1987 Duodenal mucosal T-cell sub-population and
bacterial cultures in acquired immune deficiency syndrome. Am. J.
Gastroenterol.,
82:427-31. Laughton. B E, Drickman, D A. et al., 1988. Prevalence of enteric pathogens in
homosexual men with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. Gastroenterology 94:984-93. Mata. L, Urrutia. J J, et al., I984 Infectious agents in acute and chronic diarrhoea
of childhood. In: Lebenthal, E (ed) Chronic diarrhoea in children. Raven Press, NY pp.
237-252. Nelson, J A. Wiley,, C A, et al., 1988. Human immunodeficiency virus detected in
bowel epithelium from patients with gastrointestinal symptoms. Lancet i: 259-62. Smith, P D. Lane, H C. et al., 1988. Intestinal infections in patients with the
acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). Ann. Int. Med. 108: 328-33.
|
DDOnline Dialogue
on Diarrhoea Online Issue 35 December 1988 3 Page 4 5
Diarrhoea pathophysiology |
Mechanisms of diarrhoea and why they matter
What happens in the body when someone has diarrhoea? How can understanding the
mechanisms help us to give better treatment to patients? William Cutting
discusses these questions. With diarrhoea, the water content and, usually, the number and volume of stools all
increase. Stools also change in consistency, colour and smell. Because normal patterns of
defaecation differ considerably, it is usually the patient or the mother who first
diagnoses diarrhoea - noticing that the stools have become more liquid, frequent and
different in appearance. In many cases diarrhoea stools are watery but, if blood is visible in stools, the
condition is called dysentery. Most episodes of diarrhoea are acute, coming on suddenly
and lasting only a few days. In some, the diarrhoea persists and the condition becomes
protracted or even chronic. This article concentrates on acute diarrhoea. Structure and function of the bowel
The alimentary tract is much more than a tube from mouth to anus. Its main function is
to take in and absorb the fluid and nourishment the body needs for function, growth and
repair. A series of glands pours in the digestive juices and the muscles of the bowel mix
and propel the contents. Food and drink may often be contaminated with dangerous
organisms. The body is protected by the acid stomach juices and also by specific and
non-specific immune defence mechanisms. These differentiate between different types of
protein molecules swallowed. Food protein must be absorbed, but the immune responses of
the bowel have to block, inactivate or kill dangerous micro-organisms - pathogens - but
not those which normally live in the bowel and do no harm (commensals). The small bowel or intestine is where most fluid and food is absorbed. The large bowel
or intestine absorbs less water, and also acts as a reservoir. The structure of the small
bowel is designed to give a maximum surface area of contact between the fluid contents of
the lumen (the central cavity or space of the bowel) and the tissue of the bowel wall. Although an adult small bowel looks from the outside like a tube about three metres
long and 4 cms in diameter, its inner surface shows a series of folds covered by many
finger or leaf-like processes, the villi. Each villus is covered with specialised cells,
called enterocytes, responsible for secretion, digestion, acting as a defence barrier and
absorption. They have a short life, the whole membrane lining being replaced every three
to four days. Brush-like filaments cover each enterocyte, further increasing the surface
area. It has been calculated that the inner surface area of the healthy small bowel is
enormous: approximately 2000 square metres, or about the size of a football pitch. The
final function of the bowel is to excrete unabsorbed food and fluids, old and damaged
cells, toxins, harmful agents and other waste materials.
|
DDOnline Dialogue
on Diarrhoea Online Issue 35 December 1988 4 Page 5 6
Diarrhoea pathophysiology |
Fluid exchanges and diarrhoea A healthy adult in a temperate climate drinks about two litres of fluid per day. Much
more is needed in hot climates. Usually much less fluid is taken by mouth than is secreted
into the bowel (seven to eight litres) by the various digestive glands along its length
(see="#Figure 1">Figure 1). Most bowel fluid is reabsorbed, as the stools
normally contain only about 100-200 ml (0.1 to 0.2 litres) of fluid per day. A significant
increase in this excreted fluid volume constitutes diarrhoea. This is due either to a
failure of the bowel to absorb or reabsorb fluid, or to a great increase in fluid secreted
into the bowel. How germs and other factors cause watery diarrhoea will be considered
below. Most serious consequences of diarrhoea are due to the loss of water and salts in the
stools. Too much water loss is called dehydration. Fluid is first lost from the
bloodstream and so the heart tries to compensate by beating faster. Fluid is then drawn
into the blood vessels from the body tissues, and circulation to less essential areas
closes down. Limbs begin to feel cold and pulses are weak. Eventually even circulation to
essential areas like the kidneys and brain begins to collapse, urine volume decreases and
consciousness is impaired. In some types of diarrhoea, for example cholera, there is an
excessive loss of sodium ions. The acid-based regulating system may be disturbed, and deep
and rapid respiration indicates the onset of acidosis.
Figure 1. The majority of the fluid
taken into the bowel is normally reabsorbed. A significant increase in the amount of fluid
excreted constitutes diarrhoea. |
|
How germs cause diarrhoea
To cause diarrhoea, pathogenic organisms must be swallowed, they must survive the acid
in the stomach, colonise the small bowel and stick to the enterocytes. They produce their
harmful effects by one of several mechanisms. Secretory diarrhoea
|
Figure 2. Secretory diarrhoea is caused by these chain of events.
Two types of bacteria produce diarrhoea in a similar way, Vibrio cholerae and
enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC). After adhering (sticking) to the wall of
the bowel, a toxin enters the enterocytes and stimulates an enzyme called adenylatecyclase
(see="#Figure 2">Figure 2). This causes a chain of reactions which releases
energy and results in the secretion of sodium and chloride ions (electrolytes) -
accompanied by water - into the lumen of the bowel.
|
Once a cell has been stimulated in this way it will continue to secrete fluid and
electrolyte for the rest of its short life. With thousands and even millions of
enterocytes all secreting uncontrollably, the bowel cannot reabsorb all the fluid and the
result is watery diarrhoea. This 'secretory diarrhoea' can cause dehydration, circulatory
collapse and death. Invasive diarrhoea Other pathogens produce diarrhoea in a different way. The Shigella bacteria not
only colonise the surface of the small bowel but they also penetrate and invade the mucous
membrane. Many enterocytes are destroyed, blood vessels may rupture, the white cells of
the patient's defence mechanism die and are excreted as pus along with blood and tissue
fluid. The result is dysentery diarrhoea. Other invasive germs include the food-poisoning Salmonellae
bacteria. These cause less local damage but penetrate blood vessels causing
bacteraemia - circulation of pathogens in the bloodstream - and generalised illness with
fever and vomiting. The rotavirus is also a common cause of acute diarrhoea in small children. The
organisms penetrate the small bowel in patches, killing many enterocytes and in this way
reducing the surface for absorption. They may also have some secretory mechanism since
they often produce a watery diarrhoea. Practical importance of the diarrhoea mechanisms
Because water and electrolytes are lost in all types of diarrhoea, replacement of these
by rehydration is always the first priority treatment. Examination of the diarrhoea stools
by eye can help to identify invasive diarrhoea. Cases in which there is much blood suggest
Shigella dysentery. Children with this type of diarrhoea who seem seriously ill require
specific antibiotics in addition to rehydration. In the severe secretory (watery)
diarrhoea, it is known that sodium deficiency and acidosis are common. Specific correction
by appropriate rehydration fluids should be started as early as possible. Dr W A M Cutting, Senior Lecturer in Child Health, Department of Child Life and
Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
|
DDOnline Dialogue
on Diarrhoea Online Issue 35 December 1988 5 Page 6 7
Home-made ORS
Drs Pisacane and Matsitukwa
present findings based on their experience in the Mashonaland West Province of Zimbabwe,
where a standard beer or soft drink bottle-top has been used to measure sugar and salt. Even in countries where packets of oral rehydration salts (ORS) are available, mothers
need to know how to make up an effective, standard, cheap recommended home solution, from
available ingredients. In Zimbabwe the nationally recommended home solution is sugar-salt
solution. One major disadvantage of homemade sugar-salt solutions (SSS), however, can be the
great variability of the salt and sugar concentrations. Several different sized measuring
instruments may be used, and incorrect measuring takes place due to lack of appropriate
education. Solutions containing too much sugar and/or salt can be dangerous, especially
for infants (see references). How the study was carried out
We worked with two groups of mothers. Group A consisted of 70 women attending two rural
clinics; Group B of 50 women living on a remote farm. Almost all the mothers knew about
the National Policy for preparing SSS, which is to add six level teaspoons of sugar and
half a level teaspoon of salt to 750 ml of water. This is the volume of fluid held in the
available standard soft-drink bottle. All the women were asked to measure amounts of salt
and sugar for making a standard solution and to put the volumes of solid ingredients in
separate plastic bags. To measure salt and sugar, Group A mothers were shown seven spoons
and asked to choose and use a teaspoon similar to the one they used at home. The women on
the farm, Group B, used their own teaspoons which were all alike and rather flat. The same
two groups were then asked to measure salt and sugar using the commonly available
soft-drink bottle-tops, and again putting the ingredients into separate labelled plastic
bags. The instruction for this was to use one level bottle-top of salt and ten level
bottle-tops of sugar for the standard 750 ml of water. Assessing the results
The outcome was assessed by weighing the salt and sugar in the plastic bags and
calculating the concentration of sodium in mmol per litre and of sugar in grams per
litre. Most mothers in Group A, who had to choose a spoon, prepared solutions with too much
salt and sugar. (There was also a very wide variation in concentration, both in range and
standard deviation). The mothers in Group B, who used their own home spoons which were all
alike and more shallow, produced concentrations nearer to the safe and appropriate values
intended by the National Policy. Out of Group A, 61 per cent of mothers prepared a
solution containing over 90 mmols of sodium per litre, but only 12 per cent of Group B
mothers prepared such a concentrated solution (see="#table">Table). Using the
bottle-tops, concentrations of both sugar and salt were more consistent; only 11 per cent
of Group A mothers and 8 per cent of Group B mothers produced sodium concentrations above
90 mmol and sugar concentrations showed a similar pattern of greater accuracy. Discussion The variations found when using spoons is probably because most mothers in Group A
selected a spoon that was quite deep. This type of spoon, larger than the standard 5ml
teaspoon, is commonly found in the shops around the clinics. A smaller, flatter spoon was
the only type available on the farm of the Group B mothers. The more consistent results
from both groups when using bottle-tops was not only because their size was completely
standard, but also because screw-on type bottle-tops have clear edges. With some spoons
the edges slope and it is difficult to define what is a true 'level teaspoonful'. In the
situation of rural Zimbabwe, the bottle-top is widely available, gave reliable
measurements and is therefore the more satisfactory measuring device. Other countries
promoting homemade SSS rehydration solutions may benefit from this experience and consider
using bottle-tops as the standard for measuring sugar and salt.
Concentrations of sodium and
sugar
as measured by mothers using spoons or bottle-tops |
|
Group A (Clinic mothers selected
spoons) N = 70 |
Group B (Farm mothers own spoons) N =
50 |
Instrument used |
spoon |
bottle-top |
spoon |
bottle-top |
Sodium |
mean mmol/lit |
101* |
77* |
70 |
63 |
(Standard deviation) |
(29) |
(4) |
(18) |
(16) |
% over 90 mmol/lit |
61# |
11# |
12 |
8 |
Sugar |
mean g/lit |
42 |
40 |
31 |
40 |
(Standard deviation) |
(10) |
(3) |
(6) |
(5) |
% over 40 g/lit
*and #p<0.001 |
40 |
8 |
6 |
6 |
Dr Lovemore Matsitukwa, Health Information Officer, Mashonaland West,
Zimbabwe and Dr Alfredo Pisacane, Instituto di Paediatria, Universita di
Napoli, Via
Surgio Pansini 5, 0131 Naples, Italy. Harland. PSEG et al., 1981: Composition of oral solutions
prepared by Jamaican mothers for treatment of diarrhoea. Lancet i: 600. de Zoysa. I et al., 1984: Home-based oral dehydration therapy in rural Zimbabwe.
Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. 78:102-105. Cutts, F, 1985: The use of ORT in health facilities in Zimbabwe. Zimbabwe
Epidem.
Bull. 14:29. A Decision Process for Establishing Policy on Fluids for Home Therapy of Diarrhoea,
1987. WHO, CDD, SER/87.10. Waldman, R. 1987: Problems with home ORS. Dialogue on
Diarrhoea 28: 6.
|
DDOnline Dialogue
on Diarrhoea Online Issue 35 December 1988 6 Page 7 8
Changing patterns of drug use In="dd33.htm#page2">DD33, page two under the title 'Viewpoint',
the editors wanted to hear from other readers regarding the use of antibiotics. I, as
regional co-ordinator for the CDD Programme in the central province of the Kingdom of
Saudi Arabia, would like briefly to explain doctors' attitude to the use of antibiotics in
this part of the world. The use of antibiotic and anti-diarrhoeal drugs in Saudi Arabia was found to be high in
a study carried out three years ago. Over 20 per cent of the diarrhoea patients received
anti-diarrhoeal drugs besides the common use of antibiotics. In 1985-1986, a one-year
training programme was carried out by the Regional Directorate General of Health Affairs
to orient doctors and nurses in the management of diarrhoeal diseases. This covered 84 per
cent of hospitals in Riyadh and 100 per cent of hospitals outside Riyadh. The effect of
the orientation was very significant. Anti-diarrhoeal drug usage dropped to less than five
per cent. Doctors used antibiotics only in selected cases of diarrhoea. ORT became very
popular. Over 85 per cent of patients with diarrhoea now receive ORS. ORS is widely
available and distributed free to patients by the government. All government health
facilities have abundant ORS supply, catering for increasing consumption each year. Over 80 per cent of Health Centres in the city have set up a diarrhoea management room
or corner to demonstrate the preparation of ORS and to give some educational information. Aetiology and drug sensitivity
Hospital based studies have revealed that about 90 per cent of children who had
diarrhoea were under five years of age. The child: adult ratio was 4.5:1. Prevalence of
giardia (about 18 per cent) was greatest for older children aged five to 12 years whereas Entamoebae
histolytica was significantly more common in adults. Isolation rate for rotavirus was
found to be 30 per cent, followed by Shigella (8.3 per cent), non-typhoidal Salmonella
(4.5 per cent), campylobacter (3.5 per cent), and Vibrio cholera, none. Ampicillin was
found to be the drug of first choice with 70 per cent sensitivity for Shigella sonnei (commonest
pathogen seen here) and 60 per cent for Shigella boydii, but in the case of Shigella
flexneri, cotrimoxazole was the drug of first choice (15 per cent sensitive to
ampicillin and 50 per cent to cotrimoxazole). All of the species of Shigella and Salmonella were found to be sensitive to nalidixic
acid. Nalidixic acid was therefore regarded as a drug to be reserved for only those cases
where ampicillin or cotrimoxazole failed to achieve response, in order not to use randomly
for fear of creating resistance in future. Dr M Wasiful Alam, Diarrhoeal Control Centre, P O Box 7855, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Accepting ORT
In DD33, Dr Sharif Salry Nassif rightly pointed out that
mothers often reject treatment for diarrhoea (or other diseases for that matter), when the
results do not meet their expectations. In this case Egyptian mothers were concerned that
ORT did not necessarily stop diarrhoea, so they demanded drug therapy. To solve such
problems, more attention must be paid to the cultural context of diarrhoea. Then, with a
more thorough understanding of local beliefs, health workers should be encouraged to
provide appropriate counselling and education. Simply telling mothers that anti-diarrhoeal
drugs are not good will not address their underlying concerns. Culturally sensitive
dialogue between health workers and mothers is essential. The problem of ORT acceptance due to cultural factors is not unique to Egypt. In Papua
New Guinea, mothers also rejected ORS because, unlike traditional medications and modern
anti-diarrhoeals, it did not stop diarrhoea immediately(1). In Zimbabwe it was documented
that mothers did not see the connection between diarrhoea and one of the signs of
dehydration, sunken fontanelle, because the latter was thought to be a completely
different disease requiring its own topical treatment (2). In Nigeria some mothers
expressed fear that the sugar content in home-made SSS formula was too much and might lead
to constipation/haemorrhoids, a more dreaded condition (3). These problems were overcome with patient discussions with mothers where health workers
were willing to listen carefully to mothers' concerns, and in turn address those concerns
with careful explanation using local terminology and concepts. William R Brieger, Senior Lecturer, University of Ibadan, Nigeria. 1. Frankel, S J, and Lehmann, D, 1985. Oral rehydration: What mothers think. World
Health Forum: 6(3): 271-273. 2. de Zoysa I, 1985. Treating diarrhoea early. Dialogue on
Diarrhoea 20: 3. 3. Brieger, W R, Ramakrishna, J, et al., 1988. Developing health education for oral
rehydration therapy at a rural Nigerian clinic. Patient Education and Counselling
11:189-202. Using ORS packets to measure water volume
I have read the viewpoint expressed by Dr Chan, which appeared in DD33
under the caption 'Using ORS packets to measure water volume? ' with great interest.
As you have invited the views of readers, I thought of writing to you as we encounter
similar problems in this context. I am attached to a large plantation of tea and rubber with a resident population of
well over 1,800 workers and their families, in the capacity of the Medical Assistant in
charge of its dispensary and hospital. We use ORT extensively and we have been able to
achieve wonderful results in the reduction of infant deaths due to diarrhoea in our
plantation. As a standard container is not being introduced into the market to measure one litre of
liquid, in OR therapy we encounter similar difficulties. Earlier we were advising the
mothers to take two and a half times the standard (400cc) soft drink bottle of water or
one and a quarter times the standard liquor bottle of water. Either way it is not easy to
measure a standard volume of water. To overcome these practical difficulties I have distributed empty saline bottles which
are freely available and contain 500cc. Now we provide a plastic disposable measurer with a capacity of 200cc, but I find that
we have to issue one with every ORS packet we give to a mother as often they become
playthings of the children. In my experience I find the introduction of empty saline bottles can be of great use in
measuring an accurate volume of water needed to dissolve a packet of ORS. M C W N Perera, Hospital and Dispensary, Neuchatel State Plantations,
Neboda, Sri
Lanka.
|
DDOnline Dialogue
on Diarrhoea Online Issue 35 December 1988 7 Page 8
A problem solved?
I am interested in the 'Viewpoint' of Dr O J Chang on using ORS packets to measure
water volume. He has highlighted the problem which mothers may experience in measuring
accurately the correct volume of water in making ORS solution. In the past our village health workers were taught to use and teach the use of the beer
bottle (½ litre) as the measure, with corresponding quantities of salt and sugar measured
by hand or by spoons. When sugar disappeared from the shops and the ORS packets appeared
with the Essential Drugs Kits, it was easy to teach one packet to two beer bottles.
However, not every mother can lay hands on a beer bottle and in recent years the orange
squash bottle has appeared and is to be found in many homes. The first type of bottle to
appear happened to have a decorative marking which corresponded to half a
litre, but the
newer type of bottle is different and one and a half bottles are equal to a
litre. It was
through answering Dr. Cutting's questionnaire which came recently that we discovered
mothers are using one orange squash bottle to a packet of ORS, thus making a too
concentrated solution. So now we have invited the mothers to bring whatever measure they
intend to use to the clinic and allow us to show them a litre mark on it. We are waiting
to see how this will work out! As the editors say in their notes, more operational
research is needed. Sr Dr Margaret Garnett, Medical Missionaries of Mary, Nangwa Village Health
Programme, P O Box 144, Babati, Tanzania. ORS - correct use? I have been working for the last year and a half on a study of household management of
diarrhoea in Managua, Nicaragua. I have found a number of misconceptions about ORS use,
often propagated by the health care system itself. One practice in particular which seems
to be rather commonplace is the diluting of powdered cow's milk with ORS during diarrhoea.
It is considered a way to get the ORS into the child, and to dilute the cow's milk,
thought to be too heavy during diarrhoea. My question is whether this practice is harmful,
and if so, why. In a similar fashion, ORS is sometimes used in place of water to make such
things as rice water drinks. I would like to know more about the effects of heat on the
ORS, since these drinks are often cooked first, then cooled. And finally, what effect
adding more sugar has on the effectiveness of ORS. Any references on these issues would
also be greatly appreciated. Thanks for a great newsletter! Patricia Hudelson, Dept of Anthropology, U-176 Rm 429, University of CT, Storrs, CT
06268, USA. Dr O Fontaine, Medical Officer, CDD WHO, replies: It is not advisable to dilute cow's milk with ORS solution. Although it is not clear
from Ms Hudelson's letter how the dilution is done and what is the final composition of
the solution, this mixing procedure may produce an oral rehydration solution with
increased carbohydrate and sodium concentrations, both of which could be harmful. For
infants aged six months or older, dilution of cow's milk during diarrhoea is not necessary
unless clinical signs of lactose intolerance are observed after milk is taken (i.e.
increased diarrhoea, with abdominal pain and distension). Diluting milk may have a harmful
effect on their nutritional status by reducing calorie intake. The standard WHO-ORS formulation, properly diluted in drinking water, provides all the
necessary salts and sugar to efficiently and safely treat dehydration due to diarrhoea.
Using ORS solution to prepare rice water, or adding sugar to the ORS solution to improve
its acceptability are unnecessary, and the latter would result in an ORS solution with too
much sugar, which could worsen diarrhoea and aggravate the dehydration. ORS solution
should be prepared only with drinking water and should not be mixed with other
ingredients. Sodium bicarbonate is unstable when heated, therefore, ORS containing sodium
bicarbonate should not be heated or boiled. There is no reason to heat or boil ORS
solution if it is mixed in potable drinking water. Practical disinfection I was interested to read the letter 'The right soaking solution' in DD32. We live high in the foothills of the Himalayas and our main
sources of water are natural springs, but they can get polluted. There is a long held
belief here that potassium permanganate is an effective purifier of water, and this is
added to the water from time to time. Could you suggest a more efficient water purifier
for such a water source, which is very small, just a bucket's depth and a metre wide? For
cleaning uncooked vegetables you suggest very weak hypochlorite solution. What name this
might be available under in ordinary shops? David Hopkins, Kasturba Mahila Utthan Mandal, PO Kausani, District
Almora, U. P.
263639, India. Dr Sandy Cairncross, Department of Tropical Hygiene, London School of Hygiene and
Tropical Medicine replies: Bleach, which is a solution of chlorine, is the answer to both of these questions, and
is widely available. In the right concentration it is a powerful disinfectant suitable for
water supplies, and a dilute solution is ideal for soaking vegetables. Note: Bleach, especially concentrated bleach, is dangerous and
must be kept in a safe place where children cannot get hold of it.
|
Scientific editors Dr Katherine Elliott and Dr William Cutting
Managing editor Kathy Attawell
Editorial advisory group
Professor J Assi Adou (Ivory Coast)
Professor A G Billoo (Pakistan)
Professor David Candy (UK)
Professor Richard Feachem (UK)
Dr Shanti Ghosh (India)
Dr Michael Gracey (Australia)
Dr Norbert Hirschhorn (USA)
Dr Claudio Lanata (Peru)
Professor Leonardo Mata (Costa Rica)
Dr Jon Rohde (USA)
Dr Mike Rowland (UK)
Ms E O Sullesta (Philippines)
Professor Andrew Tomkins (UK)
Dr Paul Vesin (France) With support from AID (USA), ODA (UK), UNICEF, WHO Publishing partners
BRAC (Bangladesh)
CMAI (India)
CMU (China)
Grupo CID (USA)
HLMC (Nepal)
lmajics (Pakistan)
ORANA (Senegal)
RUHSA (India)
Consultants at University Eduardo Mondlane (Mozambique)
|
Issue no. 35 December 1988
Page Navigation
This edition of Dialogue on Diarrhoea Online is produced by Rehydration Project. Dialogue on Diarrhoea was published four times a year in English, Chinese, French, Portuguese, Spanish, Tamil,
English/Urdu and Vietnamese and reached more than a quarter of a million readers worldwide. The English edition of Dialogue on Diarrhoea was produced and distributed by Healthlink Worldwide. Healthlink Worldwide is committed to strengthening primary health care and
community-based rehabilitation in the South by maximising the use and impact
of information, providing training and resources, and actively supporting
the capacity building of partner organisations. - ISSN 0950-0235 Reproducing articles
Healthlink Worldwide encourages the reproduction of
articles in this newsletter for non-profit making and educational uses. Please
clearly credit Healthlink Worldwide as the source and, if possible, send us a copy of any uses made of the material.
|
updated: 23 August, 2019
|